The Intertextual Reading of the Utopian Discourse in English Travel Literature
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Tlemcen
Abstract
More and more criticism is interested in the utopian travel mode of writing because of the popularity it is
gaining. This art is rediscovered in new modern forms such as: science fiction dystopias, anti-utopian space
odysseys and apocalyptic dystopias, these neological genres of utopia are flourishing in arts. Thomas More’s
Utopia (1535) is considered as the founding text of the utopian travel literature and it is often read as a
pretext deeply inspiring dystopian texts written after. Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels, Lewis Carol’s
Alice in Wonderland, Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Rudyard Kipling’s Kim are regarded as travel
narrative directly or indirectly inspired by the concept of utopia. This inspiration and influence was
controversially investigated by critics. This research work analyses the intertextual relationship between
Thomas More’s Utopia a set of popular utopian travel texts through the history of English travel literature.
The many studies done on this issue have generally examined this relationship through thematic comparative
studies conducted in terms of similarities and differences between the two texts. However, the study below
has attempted to go beyond mere thematic comparison and traces the genetic link between the selected
narratives. In other terms, the extent to which these texts owe to Utopia has been examined in relation to the
generic link between the utopian mode of writing and some of its literary derivations. This has been done
through an intertextual reading of the works, where similarities and differences are reconsidered from the
assumption that Utopia and its descendent narratives belong genetically to the same literary genre. Tracing
the intertextual link between the utopian travel texts from this perspective reveals that Jonathan Swift’s
Gulliver’s Travels, Lewis Carol’s Alice in Wonderland, Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Rudyard
Kipling’s Kim rely on the dynamics of the utopian literary genre as established by More in Utopia, and make
it undergo reformulations, readaptations and reshapings contributing by that in the cloning of new utopian
literary genres genetically deriving from utopia.